子机构
400-600-1123
logo
备考资讯 提分课程 答疑社区
登录
注册
题库解析   >   其他 题型   >  
本题由1提供

Jacob Burckhardt’s view that Renaissance European women “stood on a footing of perfect equality" with Renaissance men has been repeatedly cited by feminist scholars as a prelude to their presentation of rich historical evidence of women’s inequality. In striking contrast to Burckhardt, Joan Kelly in her famous 1977 essay, “Did Women Have a Renaissance?’’ argued that the Renaissance was a period of economic and social decline for women relative both to Renaissance men and to medieval women. Recently, however, a significant trend among feminist scholars has entailed a rejection of both Kelly’s dark vision of the Renaissance and Burckhardt’s rosy one. Many recent works by these scholars stress the ways in which differences among Renaissance women—especially in terms of social status and religion—work to complicate the kinds of generalizations both Burckhardt and Kelly made on the basis of their observations about upper-class Italian women.

The trend is also evident, however, in works focusing on those middle- and upper-class European women whose ability to write gives them disproportionate representation in the historical record. Such women were, simply by virtue of their literacy, members of a tiny minority of the population, so it is risky to take their descriptions of their experiences as typical of “female experience’’ in any general sense. Tina Krontiris, for example, in her fascinating study of six Renaissance women writers, does tend at times to conflate “women” and “women writers,’’ assuming that women’s gender, irrespective of other social differences, including literacy, allows us to view women as a homogeneous social group and make that group an object of analysis. Nonetheless, Krontiris makes a significant contribution to the field and is representative of those authors who offer what might be called a cautiously optimistic assessment of Renaissance women’s achievements, although she also stresses the social obstacles Renaissance women faced when they sought to raise their “oppositional voices.” Krontiris is concerned to show women intentionally negotiating some power for themselves (at least in the realm of public discourse) against potentially constraining ideologies, but in her sober and thoughtful concluding remarks, she suggests that such verbal opposition to cultural stereotypes was highly circumscribed; women seldom attacked the basic assumptions in the ideologies that oppressed them.

The last sentence in the passage serves primarily to

    A. suggest that Krontiris’s work is not representative of recent trends among feminist scholars. 

    B. undermine the argument that literate women of the Renaissance sought to oppose social constraints imposed on them. 

    C. show a way in which Krontiris’s work illustrates a “cautiously optimistic" assessment of Renaissance women’s achievements. 

    D. summarize Krontiris’s view of the effect of literacy on the lives of upper- and middle-class Renaissance women. 

    E. illustrate the way in which Krontiris’s study differs from the studies done by Burckhardt and Kelly.

登录申友雷哥GMAT,查看答案及解析

视频解析

资深讲师题题有解析

播放器加载失败: 未检测到Flash Player,请到安装
00:00 / 00:00

文字解析

答案:
C

GMAT会员

提交
    OG视频
    申友雷哥GMAT小助手

    添加官方小助手微信
    了解更多GMAT考试与咨询

    吉祥物小蜜蜂

    关注公众号

    公众号

    扫码关注申友雷哥GMAT公众号

    立即获取12GGMAT核心资料

    微信咨询

    申友在线咨询二维码图片

    扫码添加申友雷哥GMAT官方助手

    立即咨询GMAT网课面授课程

    联系申友雷哥 全国免费咨询热线:400-600-1123

    Copyright © 2021 All Right Reserved 申友雷哥教育 版权所有 沪ICP备17005516号-3 免责声明 互联网经营许可证编号:沪B2-20210282