GMAT申友逻辑CR题库-Last year all refuse collected by Shelbyville city services was incinerated. This incineration generated a large quantity of residual ash.-OG2022-真题答案解析

题库解析 > 题型 >

本题由2提供

Last year all refuse collected by Shelbyville city services was incinerated. This incineration generated a large quantity of residual ash. In order to reduce the amount of residual ash Shelbyville generates this year to half of last year’s total, the city has revamped its collection program. This year city services will separate for recycling enough refuse to reduce the number of truckloads of refuse to be incinerated to half of last year’s number.

Which of the following is required for the revamped collection program to achieve its aim?

A. This year, no materials that city services could separate for recycling will be incinerated.

B. Separating recyclable materials from materials to be incinerated will cost Shelbyville less than half what it cost last year to dispose of the residual ash.

C. Refuse collected by city services will contain a larger proportion of recyclable materials this year than it did last year.

D. The refuse incinerated this year will generate no more residual ash per truckload incinerated than did the refuse incinerated last year.

E. The total quantity of refuse collected by Shelbyville city services this year will be no greater than that collected last year.

登录申友雷哥GMAT，查看答案及解析

视频解析

资深讲师题题有解析

{{current}} / {{duration}}

登录申友雷哥GMAT，查看完整视频

文字解析

答案：

Argument Co

nstruction

Situation To cut in half the residual ash produced at its incinerator, the city will

separate, for recycling, enough refuse to cut in half the number of truckloads of refuse going to the incinerator.

Reasoning Which option is required if the city’s revamped collection program is to achieve its aim? Cutting the number of truckloads of refuse in half must

reduce the amount of residual ash to half last year’s level. But if removal of the recycled refuse does not proportionately reduce the amount of ash, this will not happen. So, if the amount of residual ash produced per truckload increases after recycling, then the amount of ash produced will not be cut in half by

cutting in half the number of truckloads.

A. This merely indicates that no further reduction of ash through recycling could be achieved this year; it indicates nothing about how much the ash will be reduced.

B. This suggests a further benefit from recycling, but does not bear on the amount of ash that will be produced.

C. Since no information is provided about how much, if any, recyclable materials were removed from the refuse last year, this does not affect the reasoning.

D. Correct. This states a requirement for the collection program to achieve its aim. To see why this is required, assume this were not true. Suppose, instead, that the refuse

incinerated this year would generate more residual ash per truckload incinerated than the refuse incinerated last year did. If that were the case, then cutting in half the

truckloads to be incinerated would not cut in half the amount of residual ash generated by incineration.

E. This is not a requirement because even if the city collects more refuse this year, it could still cut in half the amount of residual ash by cutting in half the number of truckloads going to the incinerator.